S.R.Sahanmugam vs G.Kanagaraj — 190/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050003262024
Filing Number
330/2024
Filing Date
25-Jun-2024
Registration No
190/2024
Registration Date
05-Sep-2024
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.R.Sahanmugam
Adv. S.R.Thirukumaran
Respondent(s)
-
1.G.Kanagaraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam decreed the plaintiff's suit and ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 7,81,500/- (principal of Rs. 6,00,000/- plus accrued interest) with future interest at 9% per annum until decree and 6% thereafter, based on the plaintiff's proven evidence of a promissory note for an unsecured loan and the defendant's failure to appear or contest the claim. The court applied Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which presumes validity of the promissory note in the plaintiff's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Publication
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Publication
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 190/2024
The Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam decreed the plaintiff's suit and ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 7,81,500/- (principal of Rs. 6,00,000/- plus accrued interest) with future interest at 9% per annum until decree and 6% thereafter, based on the plaintiff's proven evidence of a promissory note for an unsecured loan and the defendant's failure to appear or contest the claim. The court applied Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which presumes validity of the promissory note in the plaintiff's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts