The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Rajannager Branch vs P.Sangeetha — 52/2021
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050002102021
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
222/2021
Filing Date
23-03-2021
Registration No
52/2021
Registration Date
30-03-2021
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Rajannager Branch
Adv. S.Helen Elizabeth
Respondent(s)
P.Sangeetha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No.52/2021 before the Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Mr. Vijayakumar (Bank Manager) on November 25, 2025. The witness testified regarding loan documents dated 10.06.2014 and 04.02.2015, including a loan application, sanction letter, guarantee deed, undertaking, and subsequent loan revival letters dated 05.06.2017, 18.09.2019, and 11.02.2021, along with postal acknowledgment and account statement. The defendant did not appear and was pronounced contumacious; therefore, no cross-examination was conducted. The court admitted the witness's deposition and marked all documentary exhibits into evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No.52/2021 before the Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Mr. Vijayakumar (Bank Manager) on November 25, 2025. The witness testified regarding loan documents dated 10.06.2014 and 04.02.2015, including a loan application, sanction letter, guarantee deed, undertaking, and subsequent loan revival letters dated 05.06.2017, 18.09.2019, and 11.02.2021, along with postal acknowledgment and account statement. The defendant did not appear and was pronounced contumacious; therefore, no cross-examination was conducted. The court admitted the witness's deposition and marked all documentary exhibits into evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts