State Bank OK N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager vs K Palanisamy — 81/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 17th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED050001882025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2025

Filing Number

197/2025

Filing Date

27-03-2025

Registration No

81/2025

Registration Date

27-03-2025

Court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

State Bank OK N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager

Adv. M.G.Shajukumar

Respondent(s)

K Palanisamy

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

17-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Ex-Parte Evidence

05-01-2026

Ex-Parte Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against K. Palanisamy, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,60,481/- with interest at 9% per annum from the suit date until decree, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the defendant's liability established through uncontested documentary evidence including loan agreements, hypothecation agreements, and revival letters, with the defendant having defaulted on repayment obligations despite multiple bank requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against K. Palanisamy, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,60,481/- with interest at 9% per annum from the suit date until decree, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the defendant's liability established through uncontested documentary evidence including loan agreements, hypothecation agreements, and revival letters, with the defendant having defaulted on repayment obligations despite multiple bank requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case