State Bank OK N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager vs K Palanisamy — 81/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 17th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050001882025
e-Filing Number
25-02-2025
Filing Number
197/2025
Filing Date
27-03-2025
Registration No
81/2025
Registration Date
27-03-2025
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank OK N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager
Adv. M.G.Shajukumar
Respondent(s)
K Palanisamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 05-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against K. Palanisamy, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,60,481/- with interest at 9% per annum from the suit date until decree, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the defendant's liability established through uncontested documentary evidence including loan agreements, hypothecation agreements, and revival letters, with the defendant having defaulted on repayment obligations despite multiple bank requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against K. Palanisamy, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,60,481/- with interest at 9% per annum from the suit date until decree, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the defendant's liability established through uncontested documentary evidence including loan agreements, hypothecation agreements, and revival letters, with the defendant having defaulted on repayment obligations despite multiple bank requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts