State Bank Of K N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager vs R Kothandan — 78/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Section 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 17th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED050001852025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-02-2025

Filing Number

194/2025

Filing Date

27-03-2025

Registration No

78/2025

Registration Date

27-03-2025

Court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Section 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

State Bank Of K N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager

Adv. M.G.Shajukumar

Respondent(s)

R Kothandan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

17-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Ex-Parte Evidence

15-12-2025

Ex-Parte Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against defendant R. Kothandan, ordering him to pay Rs. 1,53,795 (outstanding loan amount) with 9% annual interest from suit filing to decree date, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the plaintiff's claim established through documentary evidence (loan application, hypothecation agreement, revival letters, and account statement) and the defendant's failure to contest the suit after being set ex parte, rendering his default as admission of liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against defendant R. Kothandan, ordering him to pay Rs. 1,53,795 (outstanding loan amount) with 9% annual interest from suit filing to decree date, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the plaintiff's claim established through documentary evidence (loan application, hypothecation agreement, revival letters, and account statement) and the defendant's failure to contest the suit after being set ex parte, rendering his default as admission of liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case