State Bank Of K N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager vs R Kothandan — 78/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Section 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 17th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050001852025
e-Filing Number
27-02-2025
Filing Number
194/2025
Filing Date
27-03-2025
Registration No
78/2025
Registration Date
27-03-2025
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank Of K N Palayam Branch Rep by its Branch Manager
Adv. M.G.Shajukumar
Respondent(s)
R Kothandan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 15-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against defendant R. Kothandan, ordering him to pay Rs. 1,53,795 (outstanding loan amount) with 9% annual interest from suit filing to decree date, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the plaintiff's claim established through documentary evidence (loan application, hypothecation agreement, revival letters, and account statement) and the defendant's failure to contest the suit after being set ex parte, rendering his default as admission of liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against defendant R. Kothandan, ordering him to pay Rs. 1,53,795 (outstanding loan amount) with 9% annual interest from suit filing to decree date, and thereafter 6% per annum until realization. The court found the plaintiff's claim established through documentary evidence (loan application, hypothecation agreement, revival letters, and account statement) and the defendant's failure to contest the suit after being set ex parte, rendering his default as admission of liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts