M.Palanisamy vs S.M.Palanisamy Advocate - S.N.Ramesh — 146/2023
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050001592023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
165/2023
Filing Date
10-02-2023
Registration No
146/2023
Registration Date
27-03-2023
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Palanisamy
Adv. S.Rajamani
Respondent(s)
S.M.Palanisamy Advocate - S.N.Ramesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Issues
Issues
Issues
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 19-01-2026 | Issues | |
| 31-10-2025 | Issues | |
| 15-10-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-09-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil suit (O.S. No.146/2023) heard by the Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam on July 19, 2025. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of two witnesses (Palanisamy and Ragupathi) as per Section 24(24) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The documents admitted include a promissory note dated 07.02.2021 for Rs. 2,00,000, a notice dated 02.04.2022, and a postal acknowledgement dated 11.04.2022. The defendant did not appear for cross-examination, and witnesses affirmed their testimony before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil suit (O.S. No.146/2023) heard by the Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam on July 19, 2025. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of two witnesses (Palanisamy and Ragupathi) as per Section 24(24) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The documents admitted include a promissory note dated 07.02.2021 for Rs. 2,00,000, a notice dated 02.04.2022, and a postal acknowledgement dated 11.04.2022. The defendant did not appear for cross-examination, and witnesses affirmed their testimony before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts