Canara Bank, Punjai Puliampatti Branch Rep. by its Branch Manager vs S.Vellingiri — 28/2022

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED050000652022

Filing Number

72/2022

Filing Date

04-Feb-2022

Registration No

28/2022

Registration Date

09-Feb-2022

Court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank, Punjai Puliampatti Branch Rep. by its Branch Manager

    Adv. N.M.Shanmugam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Vellingiri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam (O.S. No. 28/2022, dated 11.11.2025) ruled that the defendant is liable to repay Rs. 3,60,000/- as the outstanding loan amount, having already paid Rs. 3,63,740/- towards the MSME loan of Rs. 4,60,000/- disbursed in May 2017 at 10.40% interest with a 60-month repayment schedule. The court found credible evidence supporting the loan transaction and dismissed defects in documentation raised by the defendant, ordering continuation of proceedings for recovery of the remaining balance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 02-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 29-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 07-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 02-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 05-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 08-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 10-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 18-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 30-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 02-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 23-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 24-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 06-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 06-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 06-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 31-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 10-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 05-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 21-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 27-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 07-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 13-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 04-Jan-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 19-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 22-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 29-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 14-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 11-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 09-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 04-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam (O.S. No. 28/2022, dated 11.11.2025) ruled that the defendant is liable to repay Rs. 3,60,000/- as the outstanding loan amount, having already paid Rs. 3,63,740/- towards the MSME loan of Rs. 4,60,000/- disbursed in May 2017 at 10.40% interest with a 60-month repayment schedule. The court found credible evidence supporting the loan transaction and dismissed defects in documentation raised by the defendant, ordering continuation of proceedings for recovery of the remaining balance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case