Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd rep by its U Ranithsamy vs ManojKumar — 3231/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14(1) (2). Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNED040084802025
e-Filing Number
28-08-2025
Filing Number
8057/2025
Filing Date
26-Sep-2025
Registration No
3231/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode
Judge
10-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd rep by its U Ranithsamy
Adv. Dhinagaran M
Respondent(s)
-
1.ManojKumar
Case History
-
13-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode granted Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act seeking physical possession of mortgaged property. The respondents defaulted on a Rs.26,00,000 loan, and the bank complied with statutory notice requirements before filing the petition. An Advocate Commissioner was appointed to take possession of the property, prepare an inventory, and hand it over to the bank, with authority to seek police assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Await Records
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2025
Await Records
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3231/2025
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode granted Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act seeking physical possession of mortgaged property. The respondents defaulted on a Rs.26,00,000 loan, and the bank complied with statutory notice requirements before filing the petition. An Advocate Commissioner was appointed to take possession of the property, prepare an inventory, and hand it over to the bank, with authority to seek police assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts