Sub Inspector Of Taluk Police vs Mathiyananthan — 1119/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281, 125(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 10th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED040076142025
e-Filing Number
18-09-2025
Filing Number
7229/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
1119/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode
Judge
11-Judicial Magistrate-I
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
226
Police Station
Erode Taluk Police station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sub Inspector Of Taluk Police
Adv. Inspector of Police Taluk PS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mathiyananthan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court I in Erode found the defendant guilty of causing a road accident on July 30, 2025, where he recklessly drove a bike into a pedestrian, causing a fracture. The court convicted him under BNS sections 281 (rash/negligent driving) and 125(b) (causing hurt by act endangering life), imposing a fine of ₹1,000 for section 281 and ₹10,000 for section 125(b), with imprisonment as default punishment, following his voluntary confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate-I
-
11-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-I
-
02-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-I
-
06-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1119/2025
The Judicial Magistrate Court I in Erode found the defendant guilty of causing a road accident on July 30, 2025, where he recklessly drove a bike into a pedestrian, causing a fracture. The court convicted him under BNS sections 281 (rash/negligent driving) and 125(b) (causing hurt by act endangering life), imposing a fine of ₹1,000 for section 281 and ₹10,000 for section 125(b), with imprisonment as default punishment, following his voluntary confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts