Maran vs Anishkumar — 126/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNED040061682025
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
127/2025
Filing Date
18-06-2025
Registration No
126/2025
Registration Date
04-09-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode
Judge
10-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maran
Adv. RATHINAVELU
Respondent(s)
Anishkumar
Manga
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd
Adv. Gopalakrishnan. R.K
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd
Adv. Gopalakrishnan. R.K
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Erode recorded the deposition of witness PW-1 (Kiruthanarayanan) on 24.02.2026 in MCOP Case No.126/2025, a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding a collision between a two-wheeler (Pulsar 150) and a scooter (Hero Destini Prime) that occurred at 9:00 AM, resulting in his ankle fracture and hospitalization from 21-30 May 2025. During cross-examination, the witness denied responsibility for the accident, asserting the other vehicle was at fault, and disputed claims regarding permanent disability and income loss. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, read over in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Erode recorded the deposition of witness PW-1 (Kiruthanarayanan) on 24.02.2026 in MCOP Case No.126/2025, a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding a collision between a two-wheeler (Pulsar 150) and a scooter (Hero Destini Prime) that occurred at 9:00 AM, resulting in his ankle fracture and hospitalization from 21-30 May 2025. During cross-examination, the witness denied responsibility for the accident, asserting the other vehicle was at fault, and disputed claims regarding permanent disability and income loss. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, read over in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts