Poovarasan vs Ravichandran M — 35/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNED040060432025
Filing Number
36/2025
Filing Date
25-Nov-2024
Registration No
35/2025
Registration Date
04-Sep-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode
Judge
10-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Poovarasan
Adv. RATHINAVELU
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravichandran M
-
2.Saiprasanth R
-
3.National Insurance Co Ltd, Salem
Adv. Nirmala Devi. L
-
4.National Insurance Co Ltd, Erode
Adv. Nirmala Devi. L
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Erode recorded the deposition of PW-1 (Thiru Poovarasan) on February 10, 2026, in MCOP Case No. 35/2025 under Chapter XXIII of the CrPC. The witness's statement was recorded in open court in the presence of the accused, and the witness admitted the deposition to be correct. The case was adjourned for continuation of examination-in-chief as documents required indexing per the defense's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Oct-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2025
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Erode recorded the deposition of PW-1 (Thiru Poovarasan) on February 10, 2026, in MCOP Case No. 35/2025 under Chapter XXIII of the CrPC. The witness's statement was recorded in open court in the presence of the accused, and the witness admitted the deposition to be correct. The case was adjourned for continuation of examination-in-chief as documents required indexing per the defense's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts