State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector of Police South PS Erode vs Mohamed Gouse Advocate - POOVIZHISELVAN R — 469/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112.. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNED040040452025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-07-2025

Filing Number

4029/2025

Filing Date

11-07-2025

Registration No

469/2025

Registration Date

11-07-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode

Judge

13-Judicial Magistrate-III

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

378

Police Station

Erode South Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112.
LOTTERIES REGULATION ACT, 1998 Section 5, 7(3).

Petitioner(s)

State of Tamilnadu Rep by Sub Inspector of Police South PS (Police Station) Erode

Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERODE SOUTH POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

Mohamed Gouse Advocate - POOVIZHISELVAN R

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Judicial Magistrate-III

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Questioning

04-03-2026

Trial

15-12-2025

Trial

14-11-2025

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Erode Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons charged under BNS Section 112 and Tamil Nadu Lottery Regulation Act Sections 5 and 7(3) for selling unauthorized lottery tickets, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including failure to recover actual lottery tickets, inconsistent witness statements, and lack of public complaints, thereby ordering their release under BNSS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Erode Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons charged under BNS Section 112 and Tamil Nadu Lottery Regulation Act Sections 5 and 7(3) for selling unauthorized lottery tickets, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including failure to recover actual lottery tickets, inconsistent witness statements, and lack of public complaints, thereby ordering their release under BNSS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case