Inspector of Police, Erode Town PS vs THIRUNAVUKARASU — 1093/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(C ), 20(b),(ii)(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNED040037732025
Next Hearing
14th May 2026
e-Filing Number
01-07-2025
Filing Number
3762/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
1093/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode
Judge
12-Judicial Magistrate-II
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Erode Town Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Erode Town PS (Police Station)
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERODE TOWN PS
Respondent(s)
THIRUNAVUKARASU
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Judicial Magistrate-II
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (PW4) in a drug case (STC No.1093/2025) before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode, dated 26.03.2026. The witness, a police officer, testified about the seizure of 270 grams of cannabis during a search operation on 29.03.2025 under NDPS Act and BNS sections. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the procedural legitimacy of the seizure and evidence collection, highlighting discrepancies in witness accounts and questioning the chain of custody. The court did not pronounce a final order on this deposition alone; this document records the testimony and examination phase of the ongoing trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (PW4) in a drug case (STC No.1093/2025) before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode, dated 26.03.2026. The witness, a police officer, testified about the seizure of 270 grams of cannabis during a search operation on 29.03.2025 under NDPS Act and BNS sections. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the procedural legitimacy of the seizure and evidence collection, highlighting discrepancies in witness accounts and questioning the chain of custody. The court did not pronounce a final order on this deposition alone; this document records the testimony and examination phase of the ongoing trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts