STANDARD CHARTED BANK REPRESENTED BYITS THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY V SATHYA NARAYANAN vs MOTHI A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS — 998/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNED040021282025

Await Reports

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2025

Filing Number

2126/2025

Filing Date

06-03-2025

Registration No

998/2025

Registration Date

21-04-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode

Judge

10-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14
MP/1/2025 Classification : Condonation of Delay Petition Section STANDARD CHARTED BANK REPRESENTED BYITS THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY V SATHYA NARAYANANMOTHI A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS

Petitioner(s)

STANDARD CHARTED BANK REPRESENTED BYITS THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY V SATHYA NARAYANAN

Adv. SEVUGAN K.

Respondent(s)

MOTHI A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS

T SENTHIL

V S SATHYA SARAN

K S MAHADEVAN

T GNANAM

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Chief Judicial Magistrate

21-04-2026

Await Reports

30-03-2026

Await Reports

10-03-2026

Await Reports

18-02-2026

Await Reports

09-02-2026

Await Reports

Interim Orders

08-07-2025
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary Standard Chartered Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 for assistance in taking physical possession of mortgaged property was allowed. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property, prepare inventory, and take possession, with police assistance if necessary, after the borrowers defaulted on a Rs. 1.55 crore loan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Standard Chartered Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 for assistance in taking physical possession of mortgaged property was allowed. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property, prepare inventory, and take possession, with police assistance if necessary, after the borrowers defaulted on a Rs. 1.55 crore loan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case