Rahim vs State rep by Inspector of police Erode Town police station Erode District — 504/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/s. 296(b) , 118(2), 351(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNED040016492026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1643/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

504/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode

Judge

12-Judicial Magistrate-II

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

Erode Town Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/s. 296(b) , 118(2), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahim

    Adv. Nathiya. S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State rep by Inspector of police Erode Town police station Erode District

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate-II, Erode granted bail to 23-year-old Rahim, charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(2), and 351(3), after he spent 8 days in judicial custody. The court found that given the nature of the offense, the remand period, and the victim's discharge from hospital, the accused was entitled to bail. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that he appear daily at the police station at 10:00 AM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate-II

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 504/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate-II, Erode granted bail to 23-year-old Rahim, charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(2), and 351(3), after he spent 8 days in judicial custody. The court found that given the nature of the offense, the remand period, and the victim's discharge from hospital, the accused was entitled to bail. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that he appear daily at the police station at 10:00 AM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case