Suresh vs State by Inspector of Police, Erode Tauk Police Station — 462/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNED040014162026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

1411/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

462/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode

Judge

11-Judicial Magistrate-I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

Erode Taluk Police station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh

    Adv. Thangarasu K

  2. 2.Selvakumar

    Adv. Thangarasu K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State by Inspector of Police, Erode Tauk Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode allowed the petition of Suresh and Selvakumar to fully relax their bail condition that required daily police station reporting at 10:00 AM. The court found that since the accused had complied with conditions for 18 days without fail and were breadwinners unable to work, relaxation was justified in the interest of justice, while imposing new conditions that they must not abscond, tamper with evidence, or witnesses, and appear when required by police or court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate-I

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 462/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode allowed the petition of Suresh and Selvakumar to fully relax their bail condition that required daily police station reporting at 10:00 AM. The court found that since the accused had complied with conditions for 18 days without fail and were breadwinners unable to work, relaxation was justified in the interest of justice, while imposing new conditions that they must not abscond, tamper with evidence, or witnesses, and appear when required by police or court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case