Sudhan vs Erode South P.S — 452/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNED040013952026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

1390/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

452/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode

Judge

13-Judicial Magistrate-III

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

Erode South Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudhan

    Adv. POOVIZHISELVAN R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Erode South P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate allowed the petitioner's petition to return a two-wheeler (TN 86 J 2347) seized in a case registered under BNS Section 304(2), holding that as the registered owner, he was entitled to interim custody. The court imposed conditions including proof of identity, execution of a bond, panchanama preparation, and an affidavit undertaking not to sell or dispose of the vehicle, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate-III

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-III

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-III

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate allowed the petitioner's petition to return a two-wheeler (TN 86 J 2347) seized in a case registered under BNS Section 304(2), holding that as the registered owner, he was entitled to interim custody. The court imposed conditions including proof of identity, execution of a bond, panchanama preparation, and an affidavit undertaking not to sell or dispose of the vehicle, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case