S Ramesh vs S A M Taaha — 431/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156 3. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNED040013152026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

1310/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

431/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode

Judge

12-Judicial Magistrate-II

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Erode Town Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S Ramesh

    Adv. Balasubramani L R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S A M Taaha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate II, Erode ordered the Station House Officer to register an FIR and investigate charges against four accused who allegedly demolished the petitioner's textile shop with weapons and 40 others on 18.09.2023. The court found the allegations constitute a cognizable offense despite the property-related nature of the dispute, as the alleged acts of property damage and threatening behavior disclose criminal offenses requiring investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate-II

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate-II

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate-II

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 431/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate II, Erode ordered the Station House Officer to register an FIR and investigate charges against four accused who allegedly demolished the petitioner's textile shop with weapons and 40 others on 18.09.2023. The court found the allegations constitute a cognizable offense despite the property-related nature of the dispute, as the alleged acts of property damage and threatening behavior disclose criminal offenses requiring investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case