Inspector of Police North PS vs Sivarama Krishnan and 2 Others — 500102/2017
Case under --- Section 417,306. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNED020013412017
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
600096/2017
Filing Date
18-12-2017
Registration No
500102/2017
Registration Date
18-12-2017
Court
Principal Sub Court, Erode
Judge
5-I Additional Subordinate Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
340
Police Station
Erode North Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police North PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Sivarama Krishnan and 2 Others
Hearing History
Judge: 5-I Additional Subordinate Judge
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 24-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 20-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 18-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 16-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a forensic expert testimony document from the First Additional Sessions Court in Erode (Case No. 102/2017, dated March 2, 2026) regarding handwriting and document analysis in Criminal Case No. 340/2014. The expert (a Forensic Science Officer) testified that documents marked A1-A19, B1-B4, C1-C11, and D1-D10 containing signatures and writings in Tamil and English were all written by the same person. The forensic science report was admitted as evidence (Exh. A.Th.Sa.A-10), and the defendants declined cross-examination of the expert witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a forensic expert testimony document from the First Additional Sessions Court in Erode (Case No. 102/2017, dated March 2, 2026) regarding handwriting and document analysis in Criminal Case No. 340/2014. The expert (a Forensic Science Officer) testified that documents marked A1-A19, B1-B4, C1-C11, and D1-D10 containing signatures and writings in Tamil and English were all written by the same person. The forensic science report was admitted as evidence (Exh. A.Th.Sa.A-10), and the defendants declined cross-examination of the expert witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts