P.M.Sadasivam vs P.Kalaiamutham — 266/2024

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(b). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED020007382024

Filing Number

736/2024

Filing Date

26-Jul-2024

Registration No

266/2024

Registration Date

30-Jul-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Erode

Judge

5-I Additional Subordinate Judge

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.M.Sadasivam

    Adv. S.Shanmugam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.Kalaiamutham

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  14. 04-Sep-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  15. 04-Aug-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  16. 21-Jul-2025

    Trial

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Issues

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  18. 08-Jul-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: I.A.No.01/2024 in O.S.No.266/2024 | I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode | Dated: 8 July 2025 Outcome: The petition for temporary and interim injunction is dismissed with no costs. The petitioner sought to restrain the respondent from constructing permanent structures on disputed land (600 sq ft), claiming encroachment. The court found that critical issues regarding ownership, possession, and boundaries—including whether the respondent legally owns 1200 sq ft in a different survey number—require full trial with oral and documentary evidence to be properly resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 08-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  20. 01-Jul-2025

    Orders

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  22. 19-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  23. 09-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  24. 07-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  25. 02-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  26. 30-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  27. 25-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  28. 30-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  29. 30-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 26-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: I.A.No.01/2024 in O.S.No.266/2024 | I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode | Dated: 8 July 2025 Outcome: The petition for temporary and interim injunction is dismissed with no costs. The petitioner sought to restrain the respondent from constructing permanent structures on disputed land (600 sq ft), claiming encroachment. The court found that critical issues regarding ownership, possession, and boundaries—including whether the respondent legally owns 1200 sq ft in a different survey number—require full trial with oral and documentary evidence to be properly resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case