A.Suresh vs S.M.Govindasamy — 500045/2013
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or 21. Status: Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNED020007212013
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
500045/2013
Filing Date
19-02-2013
Registration No
500045/2013
Registration Date
19-02-2013
Court
Principal Sub Court, Erode
Judge
5-I Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.Suresh
Adv. Muthusamy. A.C
Respondent(s)
S.M.Govindasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 5-I Additional Subordinate Judge
Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned
Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned
Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned
EA Pending
EA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned | |
| 01-04-2026 | Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned | |
| 30-03-2026 | Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned | |
| 17-03-2026 | EA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | EA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode dismissed a claim petition filed by Kandasamy under Order 21 Rule 58 and Section 151 CPC regarding undivided ancestral property. The petitioner failed to produce sufficient evidence to prove his claim over the disputed land (RS.No.432/1B) and could not cross-examine the respondent's witness, whereas the respondent presented registered sale deeds from 1991 and 2007. The court found the electronic copies of documents inadmissible as they lacked mandatory Section 65-B(4) certificates required under the Indian Evidence Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode dismissed a claim petition filed by Kandasamy under Order 21 Rule 58 and Section 151 CPC regarding undivided ancestral property. The petitioner failed to produce sufficient evidence to prove his claim over the disputed land (RS.No.432/1B) and could not cross-examine the respondent's witness, whereas the respondent presented registered sale deeds from 1991 and 2007. The court found the electronic copies of documents inadmissible as they lacked mandatory Section 65-B(4) certificates required under the Indian Evidence Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts