Ponnusamy K vs Bakkiyalakshmi — 5/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 21 rule II (2) and section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--Terminated on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNED020007192024

e-Filing Number

27-06-2024

Filing Number

715/2024

Filing Date

22-Jul-2024

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

06-Feb-2025

Court

Principal Sub Court, Erode

Judge

5-I Additional Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Terminated

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 21 rule II (2) and section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ponnusamy K

    Adv. Mohanraj K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bakkiyalakshmi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Orders

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Orders

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  13. 27-Nov-2025

    Orders

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Orders

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode, allowed K. Ponnusamy's petition for sale of mortgaged property against judgment debtor Bakkiyalakshmi under Order 21 Rule 11(2) CPC. The court found that despite obtaining preliminary and final decrees (dated 15.7.2019 and 9.9.2022 respectively), the respondent has evaded payment of the decretal amount and provided no valid reasons—her claims about property undervaluation and pending appeals lacked supporting evidence. The court ordered attachment of the mortgaged property and issuance of a sale proclamation to realize the decree amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 17-Oct-2025

    Orders

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  17. 15-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  19. 22-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  20. 15-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  21. 08-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  22. 25-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  23. 08-Aug-2025

    Counter

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  24. 22-Jul-2025

    Counter

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  25. 11-Jul-2025

    Counter

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  26. 27-Jun-2025

    Counter

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  27. 12-Jun-2025

    Counter

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  28. 17-Mar-2025

    Batta

    I Additional Subordinate Judge

  29. 06-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 22-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode, allowed K. Ponnusamy's petition for sale of mortgaged property against judgment debtor Bakkiyalakshmi under Order 21 Rule 11(2) CPC. The court found that despite obtaining preliminary and final decrees (dated 15.7.2019 and 9.9.2022 respectively), the respondent has evaded payment of the decretal amount and provided no valid reasons—her claims about property undervaluation and pending appeals lacked supporting evidence. The court ordered attachment of the mortgaged property and issuance of a sale proclamation to realize the decree amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case