Eswaramoorthy vs Erode Spinning Mill, S.P.Damodharan Advocate - T.Bhuvaneswar — 500276/2006
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/O 21 R37. Status: Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNED020000192006
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
500276/2006
Filing Date
19-09-2006
Registration No
500276/2006
Registration Date
19-09-2006
Court
Principal Sub Court, Erode
Judge
5-I Additional Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Eswaramoorthy
Adv. L.S.Murugesan
Respondent(s)
Erode Spinning Mill, S.P.Damodharan Advocate - T.Bhuvaneswar
SP.Damodharan
Adv. T. Bhuvaneswar
SP.Sivanandham
Adv. T. Bhuvaneswar
Sivakami
Adv. T. Bhuvaneswar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-I Additional Subordinate Judge
Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned
Orders
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned | |
| 17-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 24-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 23-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 13-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: C.S. No. 276/2006, First Additional Subordinate Court, Erode (dated 13.06.2025) Outcome: The court accepted the cross-examination statement of the first defendant and allowed the second defendant's testimony. The court upheld the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership of Erode Spinning Mills Limited, confirming 100% shareholding in the plaintiff's favor with no rights retained by the co-defendant Sivanantham, and endorsed the partition arrangement effective from 04.10.1994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: C.S. No. 276/2006, First Additional Subordinate Court, Erode (dated 13.06.2025) Outcome: The court accepted the cross-examination statement of the first defendant and allowed the second defendant's testimony. The court upheld the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership of Erode Spinning Mills Limited, confirming 100% shareholding in the plaintiff's favor with no rights retained by the co-defendant Sivanantham, and endorsed the partition arrangement effective from 04.10.1994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts