P Palaniappan vs SBI cap securities limited — 121/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNED010046672025
e-Filing Number
26-10-2025
Filing Number
1378/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
121/2025
Registration Date
01-Nov-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P Palaniappan
Adv. BOOPATHISUNDARAM K
-
2.vanitha
Adv. BOOPATHISUNDARAM K
-
3.p gayathiri
Adv. BOOPATHISUNDARAM K
Respondent(s)
-
1.SBI cap securities limited
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary SCOP No. 121/2025 | Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode Witness PW1 (Vanitha, age 46) deposed on 18.04.2026 in a matter involving her mother's death. The witness affirmed documents including the death certificate dated 28.08.2025, heirship certificate dated 27.09.2025, FIR No. 217/2025, and Aadhaar cards as evidence. No cross-examination by the opposing party was conducted. The deposition was recorded in open court and admitted as correct by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Publication
Principal District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Publication
Principal District Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 121/2025
Case Summary SCOP No. 121/2025 | Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode Witness PW1 (Vanitha, age 46) deposed on 18.04.2026 in a matter involving her mother's death. The witness affirmed documents including the death certificate dated 28.08.2025, heirship certificate dated 27.09.2025, FIR No. 217/2025, and Aadhaar cards as evidence. No cross-examination by the opposing party was conducted. The deposition was recorded in open court and admitted as correct by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts