Rachal Nirmala vs Revathi — 638/2025
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d),27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 07th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED010042702025
Filing Number
1256/2025
Filing Date
06-Oct-2025
Registration No
638/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Withdrawn
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rachal Nirmala
Adv. Babu. S.K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Revathi
-
2.Vanmathi
-
3.District Collector - Erode
-
4.The Tahsildar
-
5.The Assistant Commissioner Pf
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of DecreeView PDF
Summary: The Principal District Court of Erode dismissed the suit (OS No. 638/2025) filed by Rachal Nirmala seeking a declaration that she is the legal heir of deceased T. Venthan and an injunction restraining the Employees Provident Fund Organization from disbursing death benefits to two other women. The court allowed the dismissal as the plaintiff withdrew the suit, with no costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 638/2025
Summary: The Principal District Court of Erode dismissed the suit (OS No. 638/2025) filed by Rachal Nirmala seeking a declaration that she is the legal heir of deceased T. Venthan and an injunction restraining the Employees Provident Fund Organization from disbursing death benefits to two other women. The court allowed the dismissal as the plaintiff withdrew the suit, with no costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts