Inspector of police, Erode GRP chennai vs Mariyappan — 89/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 328,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNED010040842024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3083/2024
Filing Date
16-08-2024
Registration No
89/2024
Registration Date
16-08-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
3-II Additional District Judge
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
R.P.F. Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of police, Erode GRP chennai
Adv. public prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Mariyappan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-II Additional District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Questioning
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Erode Additional District Magistrate Court acquitted the second accused (Mariyappan) of charges under IPC Sections 328 (administering drug to render unconscious) and 379 (theft) on April 6, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim was not produced as a witness, no eyewitnesses testified, and critical evidence like the FIR and confessional statement of an unrelated person could not substantiate the accusations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Erode Additional District Magistrate Court acquitted the second accused (Mariyappan) of charges under IPC Sections 328 (administering drug to render unconscious) and 379 (theft) on April 6, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim was not produced as a witness, no eyewitnesses testified, and critical evidence like the FIR and confessional statement of an unrelated person could not substantiate the accusations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts