Inspector of police, Erode GRP chennai vs Mariyappan — 89/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 328,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNED010040842024
Filing Number
3083/2024
Filing Date
16-Aug-2024
Registration No
89/2024
Registration Date
16-Aug-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
3-II Additional District Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
R.P.F. Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of police, Erode GRP chennai
Adv. public prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mariyappan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Erode Additional District Magistrate Court acquitted the second accused (Mariyappan) of charges under IPC Sections 328 (administering drug to render unconscious) and 379 (theft) on April 6, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim was not produced as a witness, no eyewitnesses testified, and critical evidence like the FIR and confessional statement of an unrelated person could not substantiate the accusations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
II Additional District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgement
II Additional District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
II Additional District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
II Additional District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Questioning
II Additional District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Summon
II Additional District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
II Additional District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Framing of Charges
II Additional District Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
II Additional District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
II Additional District Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
II Additional District Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
II Additional District Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Appearance
II Additional District Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
Appearance
II Additional District Judge
-
07-Feb-2025
Remand
II Additional District Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Remand
II Additional District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Remand
II Additional District Judge
-
30-Dec-2024
Remand
II Additional District Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
For further Proceedings
II Additional District Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
For further Proceedings
II Additional District Judge
-
04-Nov-2024
For further Proceedings
II Additional District Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
For further Proceedings
II Additional District Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
For further Proceedings
II Additional District Judge
-
23-Sep-2024
For further Proceedings
II Additional District Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
For further Proceedings
II Additional District Judge
-
19-Aug-2024
Remand
Principal District Judge
-
16-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 89/2024
Court Decision Summary The Erode Additional District Magistrate Court acquitted the second accused (Mariyappan) of charges under IPC Sections 328 (administering drug to render unconscious) and 379 (theft) on April 6, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim was not produced as a witness, no eyewitnesses testified, and critical evidence like the FIR and confessional statement of an unrelated person could not substantiate the accusations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts