S MUNIAPPAGOUNDER vs V S MOHANA — 93/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNED010039812025
e-Filing Number
02-09-2025
Filing Number
1159/2025
Filing Date
11-Sep-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
11-Sep-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S MUNIAPPAGOUNDER
Adv. Murugapperuman K
-
2.S MUNIAPPAN
Adv. Murugapperuman K
Respondent(s)
-
1.V S MOHANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Principal District Court, Erode allowed the transfer petition and withdrew Original Suit No. 422/2016 from the District Munsif Court, Bhavani to consolidate it with Probate O.P. No. 109/2022 for joint trial before the Principal District Court. The court found both proceedings involved the same property and document, and consolidation would prevent conflicting judgments and procedural multiplicity while serving party convenience. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2025
The Principal District Court, Erode allowed the transfer petition and withdrew Original Suit No. 422/2016 from the District Munsif Court, Bhavani to consolidate it with Probate O.P. No. 109/2022 for joint trial before the Principal District Court. The court found both proceedings involved the same property and document, and consolidation would prevent conflicting judgments and procedural multiplicity while serving party convenience. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts