G. Gopalakrishnan vs K. Kasiviswanathan — 236/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 26th March 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNED010036522022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2757/2022
Filing Date
01-08-2022
Registration No
236/2022
Registration Date
17-11-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
3-II Additional District Judge
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G. Gopalakrishnan
Adv. Palanisamy.P.C.
Respondent(s)
K. Kasiviswanathan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-II Additional District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-12-2025 | Arguments | |
| 19-11-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 90,000. The court found that the accused borrowed money from the complainant, issued a post-dated cheque that was dishonored due to account closure, and failed to pay despite legal notice. The court confirmed the sentence of six months simple imprisonment and Rs. 90,000 compensation, rejecting the appellant's defense that the cheque was issued to a third party, as the accused admitted his signature and failed to rebut the statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 90,000. The court found that the accused borrowed money from the complainant, issued a post-dated cheque that was dishonored due to account closure, and failed to pay despite legal notice. The court confirmed the sentence of six months simple imprisonment and Rs. 90,000 compensation, rejecting the appellant's defense that the cheque was issued to a third party, as the accused admitted his signature and failed to rebut the statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts