G. Gopalakrishnan vs K. Kasiviswanathan — 236/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 26th March 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNED010036522022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2757/2022

Filing Date

01-08-2022

Registration No

236/2022

Registration Date

17-11-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Erode

Judge

3-II Additional District Judge

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 374

Petitioner(s)

G. Gopalakrishnan

Adv. Palanisamy.P.C.

Respondent(s)

K. Kasiviswanathan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-II Additional District Judge

26-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Judgement

17-02-2026

Judgement

17-12-2025

Arguments

19-11-2025

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 90,000. The court found that the accused borrowed money from the complainant, issued a post-dated cheque that was dishonored due to account closure, and failed to pay despite legal notice. The court confirmed the sentence of six months simple imprisonment and Rs. 90,000 compensation, rejecting the appellant's defense that the cheque was issued to a third party, as the accused admitted his signature and failed to rebut the statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed the criminal appeal and upheld the accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 90,000. The court found that the accused borrowed money from the complainant, issued a post-dated cheque that was dishonored due to account closure, and failed to pay despite legal notice. The court confirmed the sentence of six months simple imprisonment and Rs. 90,000 compensation, rejecting the appellant's defense that the cheque was issued to a third party, as the accused admitted his signature and failed to rebut the statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Erode All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case