The Inspector of Police, Erode South PS, Cr no 380/2019 vs Veeramani — 38/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,294(b),325,326,342,364. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNED010019532022
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1504/2022
Filing Date
23-04-2022
Registration No
38/2022
Registration Date
23-04-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
3-II Additional District Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
380
Police Station
Erode South Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police, Erode South PS (Police Station), Cr no 380/2019
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Veeramani
Senthil
Vivek @ Appu
Karthick
Siva Prasath
Prem @ Premkumar
Kiran
Shreedhar
Saravanan @ Pura Saravanan
Nagaraj (died)
Tools Gobinath @ Gobinath
K. Kowshik
Hearing History
Judge: 3-II Additional District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a witness examination record (Form 53) from the II Additional Sessions Court, Erode, dated January 20, 2026, in case S.C.No. 38/2022. The witness testified that he has no knowledge of the case, the complainant, or the accused, and only recalled giving his signature to a police officer at a hospital approximately 6-7 years ago without knowing the reason. The court record notes that no cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness examination record (Form 53) from the II Additional Sessions Court, Erode, dated January 20, 2026, in case S.C.No. 38/2022. The witness testified that he has no knowledge of the case, the complainant, or the accused, and only recalled giving his signature to a police officer at a hospital approximately 6-7 years ago without knowing the reason. The court record notes that no cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts