C.Santhosh Balu, vs Nishant Hospital, rep by its Medical Director — 320/2019

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED010018772019

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1638/2019

Filing Date

08-08-2019

Registration No

320/2019

Registration Date

08-08-2019

Court

Principal District Court, Erode

Judge

2-I Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section 22
IA/5/2026 Classification : Others Section United India Insurance companyC.Santhosh Balu,

Petitioner(s)

C.Santhosh Balu,

Adv. Kannan.U

Minor. S.Krishnaya Rep by its Father C.Santhosh Balu

Respondent(s)

Nishant Hospital, rep by its Medical Director

Dr.MRS. S.Sumathi Padmanaban

Dr.Padmanaban,

Sudha Hospital, rep by its Medical Dirctor

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge

17-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

07-04-2026

Evidence

30-03-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

08-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: In O.S. No. 320/2019, the court rejected the arguments that defendants 5 and 6 should be excluded from the suit or that the case should be dismissed against them. The court found that defendants 5 and 6 were necessary parties to the insurance policy dispute arising from an incident on 20.8.2018, and that the insurance company had an obligation to provide information as per policy conditions. The petition against defendants 5 and 6 was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. No. 320/2019, the court rejected the arguments that defendants 5 and 6 should be excluded from the suit or that the case should be dismissed against them. The court found that defendants 5 and 6 were necessary parties to the insurance policy dispute arising from an incident on 20.8.2018, and that the insurance company had an obligation to provide information as per policy conditions. The petition against defendants 5 and 6 was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Erode All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case