Parimaladevi and two others vs Marappa Gounder and 6 others Advocate - Raja P. — 200219/2017
Case under --- Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNED010007192017
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200219/2017
Filing Date
13-12-2017
Registration No
200219/2017
Registration Date
13-12-2017
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parimaladevi and two others
Adv. Yuvaraj. A
Banupriya
Adv. Yuvaraj. A
Shanmugam
Adv. Yuvaraj. A
Respondent(s)
Marappa Gounder and 6 others Advocate - Raja P.
Loganathan
Adv. Raja P.
Nallammal
Adv. S. Gowri Sankar
Sulochana
Adv. S. Gowri Sankar
Kathiresan
Adv. S. Gowri Sankar
Kumarasamy
Adv. S. Gowri Sankar
Manoranjitham
Adv. S. Gowri Sankar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary In this property succession case (O.S. No. 219/2017), the court upheld the validity of a will executed by one of the heirs (13th defendant) and confirmed that defendant 13 is entitled to 1.27½ acres of property with an additional 1/3 share of other ancestral properties as per the will's provisions. The court rejected contentions challenging the will's authenticity and affirmed the legal entitlement based on the documented will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this property succession case (O.S. No. 219/2017), the court upheld the validity of a will executed by one of the heirs (13th defendant) and confirmed that defendant 13 is entitled to 1.27½ acres of property with an additional 1/3 share of other ancestral properties as per the will's provisions. The court rejected contentions challenging the will's authenticity and affirmed the legal entitlement based on the documented will. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts