R.C. Savithri vs N. Rajammal (mentaly ill and deaf) Advocate - Raju. Sivasubramaniam — 200120/2018
Case under --- Section 151. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED010003922018
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200120/2018
Filing Date
27-04-2018
Registration No
200120/2018
Registration Date
27-04-2018
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.C. Savithri
Adv. Manivel
Respondent(s)
N. Rajammal (mentaly ill and deaf) Advocate - Raju. Sivasubramaniam
P. Venkatesan
Adv. Raju. Sivasubramaniam
The Manager, DCB Bank
Adv. Gopalakrishnan. R.K
The Sub Registrar
Adv. Arulmurugan.M
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 15-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 25-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking to retrieve bank documents (specimen signatures and impressions) from Central Bank of India to verify the authenticity of a registered Will-Deed document dated 09.01.2012. The court found it necessary and justified to order the bank to produce the original signature specimen and impression records of the deceased account holder (M. Rajammal) to compare with the signatures in the disputed Will-Deed document, as the petitioner claims it will establish or refute the document's authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking to retrieve bank documents (specimen signatures and impressions) from Central Bank of India to verify the authenticity of a registered Will-Deed document dated 09.01.2012. The court found it necessary and justified to order the bank to produce the original signature specimen and impression records of the deceased account holder (M. Rajammal) to compare with the signatures in the disputed Will-Deed document, as the petitioner claims it will establish or refute the document's authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts