R.M.Jayamurugan vs M.Paramasivam — 14/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNED010003912023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
81/2023
Filing Date
12-01-2023
Registration No
14/2023
Registration Date
19-01-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Erode
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.M.Jayamurugan
Adv. R.Ganesh
Respondent(s)
M.Paramasivam
M.Loganathan
M.Thirumoorthy
T.Selvaraj
P.Pannerselavam
P.Baskaran
P.Ganeshan
Valliyammal
P.Gopalakrishnan
M.Sakunthala
V.K.Subramaniam
P.Lingamoorthy
S.Varadharajan
P.Venkatachalam
P.Saravanakumar
P.Subramaniam
P.Devarajan
T.C.P.Mani @ P.Subramaniam
P.Palaniammal
Nagammal
G.K.Kandasamy
K.Kumar
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | Orders | |
| 28-01-2026 | Orders | |
| 03-01-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 16-12-2025 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District Judge, Erode allowed the transfer petition and withdrew suits OS No. 21/2008 and OS No. 70/2017 from the District Munsif Court, Perundurai, transferring them to the I Additional District Judge, Erode for joint/simultaneous trial with OS No. 100/2020. The court found the three suits involved overlapping properties with interconnected issues, and consolidating them would avoid conflicting judgments and multiplicity of proceedings, while directing parties to cooperate for expeditious disposal without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District Judge, Erode allowed the transfer petition and withdrew suits OS No. 21/2008 and OS No. 70/2017 from the District Munsif Court, Perundurai, transferring them to the I Additional District Judge, Erode for joint/simultaneous trial with OS No. 100/2020. The court found the three suits involved overlapping properties with interconnected issues, and consolidating them would avoid conflicting judgments and multiplicity of proceedings, while directing parties to cooperate for expeditious disposal without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts