Senthilkumar vs G Yoganandhan — 21/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3-A). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNED010002282024

Arguments

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-01-2024

Filing Number

174/2024

Filing Date

08-01-2024

Registration No

21/2024

Registration Date

08-01-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Erode

Judge

3-II Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 374(3-A)
MP/1/2024 Classification : 389 Cr.PC Section Senthilkumar

Petitioner(s)

Senthilkumar

Adv. Sreetha Karuppannan

Respondent(s)

G Yoganandhan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-II Additional District Judge

10-03-2026

Arguments

25-11-2025

Arguments

14-08-2025

Arguments

06-06-2025

Await Records

25-02-2025

Await Records

Interim Orders

11-01-2024
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition for suspension of sentence under Section 389(1) CrPC is granted. The accused S. Senthilkumar, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for three months imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 2,50,000 compensation, has been granted suspension of his sentence pending appeal. The suspension is conditional: he must deposit 20% of the cheque amount within 30 days and execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within 15 days of deposit, failing which the suspension order will automatically stand vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for suspension of sentence under Section 389(1) CrPC is granted. The accused S. Senthilkumar, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for three months imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 2,50,000 compensation, has been granted suspension of his sentence pending appeal. The suspension is conditional: he must deposit 20% of the cheque amount within 30 days and execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within 15 days of deposit, failing which the suspension order will automatically stand vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Erode All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case