Sivamani vs R Thilagar — 47/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNDP100003242024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-11-2024
Filing Number
360/2024
Filing Date
12-11-2024
Registration No
47/2024
Registration Date
26-11-2024
Court
Sub Court, Harur
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge, Harur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivamani
Adv. MUNIYANDI G
Minor Priyadharshini
Adv. MUNIYANDI G
Minor Priya
Adv. MUNIYANDI G
Minor Saladevi
Adv. MUNIYANDI G
Amaravathi
Adv. MUNIYANDI G
Amaravathi
Respondent(s)
R Thilagar
PRM Road Ways Private Limited Represented by The Managing Director
The Branch Manager, ICICI Lombard Nibhaye Vaade
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge, Harur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Lok Adalat
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP 47/2024 This motor vehicle accident compensation case involved a fatal collision between a two-wheeler (TN29BT4093) operated by the petitioner's husband and a bus (TN87C6499) near Periyakulum. The petitioner Sivamani and minor daughters sought compensation for the death. The court heard cross-examinations of the petitioner and bus operator respondent regarding accident circumstances, liability, vehicle insurance, and driver qualifications. The case addresses whether the bus operator's insurance company must pay compensation for the fatality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP 47/2024 This motor vehicle accident compensation case involved a fatal collision between a two-wheeler (TN29BT4093) operated by the petitioner's husband and a bus (TN87C6499) near Periyakulum. The petitioner Sivamani and minor daughters sought compensation for the death. The court heard cross-examinations of the petitioner and bus operator respondent regarding accident circumstances, liability, vehicle insurance, and driver qualifications. The case addresses whether the bus operator's insurance company must pay compensation for the fatality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts