SHANKAR vs GANDHIMATHI — 28/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section SECTION166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNDP100000432025

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

23-01-2025

Filing Number

47/2025

Filing Date

23-01-2025

Registration No

28/2025

Registration Date

21-03-2025

Court

Sub Court, Harur

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge, Harur

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section SECTION166
TAMIL NADU MOTOR VEHICLE RULES 1989 Section RULE3
IA/2/2025 Classification : Petition to Summon Witness Section SHANKARGANDHIMATHI
IA/3/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section SHANKARGANDHIMATHI

Petitioner(s)

SHANKAR

Adv. Tamilraj K

Respondent(s)

GANDHIMATHI

National Insurance Company Limited

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge, Harur

04-06-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Enquiry

14-03-2026

Enquiry

19-02-2026

Lok Adalat

29-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

04-06-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary of Case 28/2025 In this motor vehicle accident case before the Subsidiary Court at Aruor, Dharmapuri District, witness Shankar (petitioner/driver, age 40) affirmed his testimony on June 4, 2026, detailing a vehicle accident involving respondent Gandhimathi and National Insurance Company Limited. The court accepted Shankar's examination-in-chief statement with supporting documentary evidence (FIR, medical discharge summary, vehicle RC book, insurance policy, and driving licenses). Cross-examination of the second respondent has been adjourned to a later date at the counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 28/2025 In this motor vehicle accident case before the Subsidiary Court at Aruor, Dharmapuri District, witness Shankar (petitioner/driver, age 40) affirmed his testimony on June 4, 2026, detailing a vehicle accident involving respondent Gandhimathi and National Insurance Company Limited. The court accepted Shankar's examination-in-chief statement with supporting documentary evidence (FIR, medical discharge summary, vehicle RC book, insurance policy, and driving licenses). Cross-examination of the second respondent has been adjourned to a later date at the counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Harur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case