Rajeshwari W/o Pachiyappan vs K.Pachiyappan S/o Sukkidi (a) Kandhasamy — 336/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDP010040302024

Filing Number

976/2024

Filing Date

16-Dec-2024

Registration No

336/2024

Registration Date

20-Dec-2024

Court

Principal District and Sessions Court, Dharmapuri

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajeshwari W/o Pachiyappan

    Adv. S.Murugesan

  2. 2.Kala D/o. Pachiyappan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.Pachiyappan S/o Sukkidi (a) Kandhasamy

  2. 2.Sagunthala W/o.Late. Rajaganapathi

  3. 3.Minor. Shalini D/o. Late. Rajaganapathi

  4. 4.Minor. Monisha D/o. Late. Rajaganapathi

  5. 5.Minor. Dharanish S/o. Late. Rajaganapathi

  6. 6.Sankar Narayanan S/o. Late. Varatharaju Naidu

  7. 7.Ravikumar S/o. Janarathanan

  8. 8.Premasudha W/o. Sanakaranarayanan

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: O.S.No.336/2024 The Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri dismissed a petition (I.A.No.4/2025) filed by defendant Ravikumar seeking rejection of the plaint filed by Rajeshwari and Kala. The dispute concerns ancestral joint family properties partitioned in 1994 and subsequently sold in 2007. The court held that daughters are entitled to joint family properties under Section 6(5) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and that the plaintiffs have a valid cause of action requiring trial, not dismissal at the preliminary stage. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  15. 17-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  16. 12-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  18. 22-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  19. 13-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  20. 16-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  21. 07-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  22. 27-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  23. 13-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  24. 16-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  25. 17-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  26. 30-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Judge

  27. 20-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 16-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 336/2024

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: O.S.No.336/2024 The Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri dismissed a petition (I.A.No.4/2025) filed by defendant Ravikumar seeking rejection of the plaint filed by Rajeshwari and Kala. The dispute concerns ancestral joint family properties partitioned in 1994 and subsequently sold in 2007. The court held that daughters are entitled to joint family properties under Section 6(5) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and that the plaintiffs have a valid cause of action requiring trial, not dismissal at the preliminary stage. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case