The Inspector of Police, Marandahalli, P.S vs Govindasamy S/o. Baby — 38/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,307,109,120B. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDP010008182025
Filing Number
562/2025
Filing Date
16-Apr-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
16-Apr-2025
Court
Principal District and Sessions Court, Dharmapuri
Judge
2-Additional District Judge
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
Marandahalli P.S
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police, Marandahalli, P.S
Adv. K.Sakthivel
Respondent(s)
-
1.Govindasamy S/o. Baby
-
2.karthick S/o Subramani
-
3.Ravi S/o. Velautham
-
4.Govindaraj S/o. Devaraj
-
5.Aravind S/o. Thangavel
-
6.Santhakumar S/o. Palanisamy
-
7.Gopi S/o. Subramani
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
22-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
16-Jun-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: S.C. No. 38/2025 This case records the deposition of P.W.19 (witness) before the Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri on 16.06.2026. The witness testified regarding evidence collected on 13.05.2024, including recovery of a cell phone (A795G, no. 8148892114) and identification of locations where items were recovered and concealed. The witness provided details about evidence markers (M/39, M/43) and corroborated police investigation findings. The court found the witness testimony credible and the evidence collection procedures properly followed according to legal requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
15-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
12-Jun-2026
Questioning
Additional District Judge
-
08-Jun-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
08-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
03-Jun-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
01-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Framing of Charges
Additional District Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Appearance
Additional District Judge
-
15-Jul-2025
Appearance
Additional District Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Appearance
Additional District Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2025
Case Summary: S.C. No. 38/2025 This case records the deposition of P.W.19 (witness) before the Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri on 16.06.2026. The witness testified regarding evidence collected on 13.05.2024, including recovery of a cell phone (A795G, no. 8148892114) and identification of locations where items were recovered and concealed. The witness provided details about evidence markers (M/39, M/43) and corroborated police investigation findings. The court found the witness testimony credible and the evidence collection procedures properly followed according to legal requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts