S. Thiyagarajan (Died) and 6 Others vs R. Senapathy and Gunasekaran — 1294/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Sec 25 (b). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG190043122022

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

2340/2022

Filing Date

11-07-2022

Registration No

1294/2022

Registration Date

11-07-2022

Court

Sub Court, Oddanchathiram

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section Sec 25 (b)

Petitioner(s)

S. Thiyagarajan (Died) and 6 Others

Adv. V. Muthukumar

Respondent(s)

R. Senapathy and Gunasekaran

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

21-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

10-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

02-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

26-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

07-03-2025
Copy of Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: OS.No. 1294/2022 and OS.No. 1367/2022 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 07.03.2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitions after detailed examination of the plaintiff's claims regarding disputed property and documentary evidence. The Judge found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate key allegations about property ownership, land records (specifically regarding Survey No. 54), and the validity of deeds produced. The court noted inconsistencies in the plaintiff's arguments and determined that the evidence presented did not support the relief sought regarding division of ancestral property among the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: OS.No. 1294/2022 and OS.No. 1367/2022 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 07.03.2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitions after detailed examination of the plaintiff's claims regarding disputed property and documentary evidence. The Judge found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate key allegations about property ownership, land records (specifically regarding Survey No. 54), and the validity of deeds produced. The court noted inconsistencies in the plaintiff's arguments and determined that the evidence presented did not support the relief sought regarding division of ancestral property among the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Oddanchathiram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case