Saranya vs T.Karthik Advocate - T.Sivachandran — 171/2022
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNDG190037342022
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
1900/2022
Filing Date
20-01-2022
Registration No
171/2022
Registration Date
20-01-2022
Court
Sub Court, Oddanchathiram
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saranya
Adv. J.Mohanraj
Respondent(s)
T.Karthik Advocate - T.Sivachandran
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a court order from the Subordinate Court, Ottanchattiram (Tamil Nadu) dated 21.12.2022 in IA No.38/2022 related to HMOP.No. 171/2022. The document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness 1 (P.W.1) under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness (a female plaintiff) testified regarding a marriage invitation card dated 10.06.2020 that was sent to both her and the opposing party for a marriage ceremony, and the court noted that her statement was recorded after she confirmed understanding the contents. The examination-in-chief was concluded and the case was adjourned for cross-examination by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Copy of Deposition
Copy of Deposition
This is a court order from the Subordinate Court, Ottanchattiram (Tamil Nadu) dated 21.12.2022 in IA No.38/2022 related to HMOP.No. 171/2022. The document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness 1 (P.W.1) under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness (a female plaintiff) testified regarding a marriage invitation card dated 10.06.2020 that was sent to both her and the opposing party for a marriage ceremony, and the court noted that her statement was recorded after she confirmed understanding the contents. The examination-in-chief was concluded and the case was adjourned for cross-examination by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts