Arumigu. Veeranarayanaperumal @ Kathirayaperumal kovil. K. Subramani vs P. Murugan (and 2 others) — 1020/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section O 7, R 1. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG190036222022
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
1844/2022
Filing Date
19-01-2022
Registration No
1020/2022
Registration Date
19-01-2022
Court
Sub Court, Oddanchathiram
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arumigu. Veeranarayanaperumal @ Kathirayaperumal kovil. K. Subramani
Adv. P. Mahendran
Respondent(s)
P. Murugan (and 2 others)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram
Written Statement
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Written Statement |
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 20-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 06-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed. The Subordinate Judge, Oddanchatram, granted the petitioner's application to amend the plaint in O.S.No.1020/2022 under Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 of the CPC. The court found the amendment petition simple in nature, noted that the respondents had no objection, and determined the reasons provided were satisfactory. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed. The Subordinate Judge, Oddanchatram, granted the petitioner's application to amend the plaint in O.S.No.1020/2022 under Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 of the CPC. The court found the amendment petition simple in nature, noted that the respondents had no objection, and determined the reasons provided were satisfactory. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts