P. Velmani vs M. Subbulakshmi Advocate - N.Palanisamy — 249/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Sec42(A). Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG190005322024

Filing Number

523/2024

Filing Date

18-Sep-2024

Registration No

249/2024

Registration Date

05-Oct-2024

Court

Sub Court, Oddanchathiram

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Sec42(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Velmani

    Adv. A. Poornachantran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. Subbulakshmi Advocate - N.Palanisamy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 249/2024 Court: Sub Court, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District Parties: P. Velmani (Petitioner) v. M. Subbulakshmi (Respondent) Decision: The court partially allowed the case. The petitioner sought restitution of ₹1,00,000 paid as advance on a property sale agreement dated 15.12.2021 with 9% interest, after the respondent failed to complete the sale within the agreed two-year period. The court rejected specific performance but ordered the respondent to refund ₹1,00,000 with 9% annual interest from 15.12.2021 to judgment date (27.03.2026) and 6% thereafter until payment, plus case costs and security charge on the property record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  17. 26-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  18. 05-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  20. 13-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  21. 17-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  22. 28-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  23. 28-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  24. 03-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  25. 21-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  26. 05-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  27. 05-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 18-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 249/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 249/2024 Court: Sub Court, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District Parties: P. Velmani (Petitioner) v. M. Subbulakshmi (Respondent) Decision: The court partially allowed the case. The petitioner sought restitution of ₹1,00,000 paid as advance on a property sale agreement dated 15.12.2021 with 9% interest, after the respondent failed to complete the sale within the agreed two-year period. The court rejected specific performance but ordered the respondent to refund ₹1,00,000 with 9% annual interest from 15.12.2021 to judgment date (27.03.2026) and 6% thereafter until payment, plus case costs and security charge on the property record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case