B. Banumathi vs T. Palaniammal — 189/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Sec 42. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG190003992024

Filing Number

393/2024

Filing Date

03-Jul-2024

Registration No

189/2024

Registration Date

19-Jul-2024

Court

Sub Court, Oddanchathiram

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Sec 42

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B. Banumathi

    Adv. M. Syed Ibrahim

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T. Palaniammal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: B. Banumathi v. T. Palaniammal (OS 189/2024) The court rejected petitioner Banumathi's claim for specific performance of a property sale agreement. While acknowledging that respondent Palaniammal received ₹45,000 as advance payment under a registered sale deed dated 12.07.2022, the court found insufficient evidence that Palaniammal breached the contract. Instead, the court awarded Banumathi recovery of the advance with interest: 9% per annum from agreement date (24.06.2024) to judgment date (27.03.2026), and 6% thereafter until payment, along with case costs and a charge on case property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  12. 22-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 22-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  17. 13-Oct-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  19. 11-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  20. 29-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  21. 22-Jul-2025

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  22. 20-Jun-2025

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  23. 21-Mar-2025

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  24. 21-Jan-2025

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  25. 05-Nov-2024

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  26. 27-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  27. 19-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 03-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B. Banumathi v. T. Palaniammal (OS 189/2024) The court rejected petitioner Banumathi's claim for specific performance of a property sale agreement. While acknowledging that respondent Palaniammal received ₹45,000 as advance payment under a registered sale deed dated 12.07.2022, the court found insufficient evidence that Palaniammal breached the contract. Instead, the court awarded Banumathi recovery of the advance with interest: 9% per annum from agreement date (24.06.2024) to judgment date (27.03.2026), and 6% thereafter until payment, along with case costs and a charge on case property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case