Chinnalapatty PS vs Parthasarathy and 3 others — 516/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG180046882022

Filing Number

4578/2022

Filing Date

16-Nov-2022

Registration No

516/2023

Registration Date

15-Sep-2023

Court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

839

Police Station

Chinnalapatti P.S.

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chinnalapatty PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parthasarathy and 3 others

  2. 2.Ganesan

  3. 3.Veeralakashmi

  4. 4.Santhosh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Athoor acquitted all four accused (Parthasarathi, Ganesan, Veeralakshmi, and Santhosh) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene speech in public) and 506(1) (criminal intimidation), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimonies were inconsistent and failed to establish that the alleged threatening remarks were made in a public vicinity or caused immediate fear to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  15. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  16. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  19. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  20. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  23. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  24. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  25. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  26. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  27. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  28. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  29. 05-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  30. 13-May-2025

    Await Reports

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  31. 02-May-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  32. 21-Mar-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  33. 28-Feb-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  34. 23-Jan-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  35. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  36. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  37. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  38. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  39. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  40. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  41. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  42. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  43. 05-Aug-2024

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  44. 19-Jul-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  45. 14-May-2024

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  46. 21-Mar-2024

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  47. 20-Feb-2024

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  48. 23-Jan-2024

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  49. 22-Dec-2023

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  50. 20-Oct-2023

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor

  51. 15-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 16-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 516/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Athoor acquitted all four accused (Parthasarathi, Ganesan, Veeralakshmi, and Santhosh) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene speech in public) and 506(1) (criminal intimidation), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimonies were inconsistent and failed to establish that the alleged threatening remarks were made in a public vicinity or caused immediate fear to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case