P.Balaji vs P.Kaliyaperumal — 640/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNDG180034442024
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
Filing Number
3397/2024
Filing Date
11-09-2024
Registration No
640/2024
Registration Date
25-09-2024
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Balaji
Adv. Renganathan
Respondent(s)
P.Kaliyaperumal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Service Pending |
| 29-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 24-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition of witness (PW.1) Balaji, a security supervisor at Anna University, recorded on 02.03.2026 in STC No. 640/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Athoor. The witness's testimony relates to alleged loans totaling ₹8,00,000 provided to the defendant in three installments (₹6,45,000 on 07.02.2023, ₹1,00,000 on 10.08.2023, and ₹55,000 on 07.09.2023), with cross-examination establishing that no documentary evidence supports these transactions and the funds were allegedly provided through personal contacts rather than formal financial channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition of witness (PW.1) Balaji, a security supervisor at Anna University, recorded on 02.03.2026 in STC No. 640/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Athoor. The witness's testimony relates to alleged loans totaling ₹8,00,000 provided to the defendant in three installments (₹6,45,000 on 07.02.2023, ₹1,00,000 on 10.08.2023, and ₹55,000 on 07.09.2023), with cross-examination establishing that no documentary evidence supports these transactions and the funds were allegedly provided through personal contacts rather than formal financial channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts