Nagammal vs Jeyakumar Advocate - D1, D2- T.R.Shanmugam, D3-D5-Exp — 8/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(c),27(d). Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG180002072025
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
18-Feb-2025
Registration No
8/2025
Registration Date
18-Feb-2025
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nagammal
Adv. Muthuvel
-
2.Sasikala
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jeyakumar Advocate - D1, D2- T.R.Shanmugam, D3-D5-Exp
-
2.Karthigai Selvi
-
3.Block Development Officer
-
4.Tahsildar
-
5.The District Collector
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
28-Apr-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
27-Mar-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
23-Mar-2026
Issues
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
07-Mar-2026
Issues
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
25-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
13-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
28-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
05-Dec-2025
IAView PDF
Case Summary: 8/2025 Petitioners: Nagammal and Sasikala Respondents: Jeyakumar Advocate (D1), T.R. Shanmugam (D2), Block Development Officer and others (D3-D5) Order: Petition ALLOWED. Court appointed a court commissioner to survey the petitioners' property, prepare detailed measurements and maps by 28.01.2026. Petitioners must pay ₹15,000 commissioner fee within 10 days. Case involves disputed land possession where respondents allegedly built structures on petitioners' property (Survey No. 208/4F) without authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
21-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
14-Nov-2025
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
06-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
28-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
13-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
16-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
25-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
06-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
14-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
23-Jun-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
02-Jun-2025
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
15-Apr-2025
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
25-Mar-2025
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
11-Mar-2025
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
27-Feb-2025
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
-
18-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2025
Case Summary: 8/2025 Petitioners: Nagammal and Sasikala Respondents: Jeyakumar Advocate (D1), T.R. Shanmugam (D2), Block Development Officer and others (D3-D5) Order: Petition ALLOWED. Court appointed a court commissioner to survey the petitioners' property, prepare detailed measurements and maps by 28.01.2026. Petitioners must pay ₹15,000 commissioner fee within 10 days. Case involves disputed land possession where respondents allegedly built structures on petitioners' property (Survey No. 208/4F) without authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts