Seed Inspector, Batlagundu vs Syngenta India Ltd — 21/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 200(a),8(A),13(1)(C). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG180001142023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
113/2023
Filing Date
05-01-2023
Registration No
21/2023
Registration Date
05-01-2023
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seed Inspector, Batlagundu
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Syngenta India Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Athoor
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a deposition (examination-in-chief and cross-examination) of Witness PW.1 in Civil Case No. 21/2023 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Athoor, recorded on 15.05.2025. The witness, an Assistant Director at an Agricultural Department, testified regarding delays in filing the case (11 months 17 days after receiving an inspection report), procedural irregularities in submitting documents to opposing parties, and violations of the Seed Control Act procedures. The court recorded the witness's testimony affirming the authenticity of documents and his version of events while noting procedural defects raised during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a deposition (examination-in-chief and cross-examination) of Witness PW.1 in Civil Case No. 21/2023 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Athoor, recorded on 15.05.2025. The witness, an Assistant Director at an Agricultural Department, testified regarding delays in filing the case (11 months 17 days after receiving an inspection report), procedural irregularities in submitting documents to opposing parties, and violations of the Seed Control Act procedures. The court recorded the witness's testimony affirming the authenticity of documents and his version of events while noting procedural defects raised during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts