Sekar, vs Rajenderan, — 142/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG160018032019
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
142/2015
Filing Date
07-09-2015
Registration No
142/2015
Registration Date
07-09-2015
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sekar,
Muthuprakash,
Manoharan
Adv. B.Ganesan
Muthu Prakash
Manoharan
Respondent(s)
Rajenderan,
Vijayalakshmi (DW
,
chairman, sithuvarpati
Tahsr, Vdr,
Dist colr, Dgl Advocate - D1,D2 - M.Mariya inbaraj, D3-PGS, D4,D5 - GP
Vijayalakshmi
The President
The Tahsildar
District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 27-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 18-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. 142/2015) from the Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur, dated 27.03.2026, concerning a property dispute over 20 cents of land. The document contains the court's examination of the defendant's testimony regarding land boundaries, ownership documents (Survey No. 264/1), pathways, and competing claims by multiple parties. The court finds several contradictions and inconsistencies in the defendant's cross-examination statements regarding the property's orientation, boundaries, and the defendant's conduct in obstructing measurement by government officials. The case appears to remain under examination with the court recording the defendant's testimony for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. 142/2015) from the Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur, dated 27.03.2026, concerning a property dispute over 20 cents of land. The document contains the court's examination of the defendant's testimony regarding land boundaries, ownership documents (Survey No. 264/1), pathways, and competing claims by multiple parties. The court finds several contradictions and inconsistencies in the defendant's cross-examination statements regarding the property's orientation, boundaries, and the defendant's conduct in obstructing measurement by government officials. The case appears to remain under examination with the court recording the defendant's testimony for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts