Jeeva(d), vs Pitchaiammal, — 28/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG160017532019
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
28/2015
Filing Date
09-03-2015
Registration No
28/2015
Registration Date
09-03-2015
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeeva(d),
Sivamurugan(d),
Ambika maheswari,
Roja,
Minor.Nagasowmiya
Adv. B. Ganesan
Sivamurugan
Ambika Maheshwari
Respondent(s)
Pitchaiammal,
Murugesan,
Sam ilango,
Subramani,
Nithya Advocate - D1, D3, D4 Exparte, D1 died, D4 K.Savadamuthu
Murugesan
Elango
Adv. Exparte
M.Subramani
Adv. K.Savadamuthu (MA)
Nithya
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 08-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 23-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 03-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript (not a final court order) from O.S.28/2015 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur, dated 04.07.2025. The document records the cross-examination of the 3rd defendant witness regarding a property dispute involving allegations of forged documents in a land sale transaction. The witness's testimony was recorded, interpreted in Tamil, and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript (not a final court order) from O.S.28/2015 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur, dated 04.07.2025. The document records the cross-examination of the 3rd defendant witness regarding a property dispute involving allegations of forged documents in a land sale transaction. The witness's testimony was recorded, interpreted in Tamil, and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts