Murugesan vs Thangaraj, — 176/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG160002382022

Filing Number

311/2022

Filing Date

22-Nov-2022

Registration No

176/2022

Registration Date

24-Nov-2022

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur

Judge

3-Principal District Munsif

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugesan

    Adv. V.Rathinam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thangaraj,

  2. 2.Shakthivel,

  3. 3.Saraswathiammal,

  4. 4.Jeyaprakash,

  5. 5.Jeyachithra,

  6. 6.Ushanandini and ors Advocate - D

  7. 7.Sakthivel

  8. 8.Saraswathiammal

  9. 9.Jeyaprakash

  10. 10.Jeyachithira

  11. 11.Nanthini

  12. 12.Alagesan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: The Principal District Munsif, Vedasandur dismissed Murugesan's partition suit (OS No. 176/2022) for default on March 17, 2026. Murugesan sought a preliminary decree for 1/4th share in the suit property, nullification of a fraudulent sale deed by defendants 1 and 7, and a permanent injunction, but failed to produce evidence despite sufficient opportunities and a conditional order. The suit was dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Munsif

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  8. 18-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  9. 19-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  10. 26-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  11. 19-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  12. 08-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  13. 27-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  14. 16-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  15. 18-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  16. 21-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  17. 07-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  18. 24-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  19. 18-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  20. 05-Mar-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  21. 07-Dec-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  22. 25-Sep-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  23. 23-Jun-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  24. 29-Mar-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  25. 25-Jan-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  26. 24-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 22-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Principal District Munsif, Vedasandur dismissed Murugesan's partition suit (OS No. 176/2022) for default on March 17, 2026. Murugesan sought a preliminary decree for 1/4th share in the suit property, nullification of a fraudulent sale deed by defendants 1 and 7, and a permanent injunction, but failed to produce evidence despite sufficient opportunities and a conditional order. The suit was dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case