R.Rajethiran vs Kamalaveni — 85/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG160001172022
Filing Number
146/2022
Filing Date
06-06-2022
Registration No
85/2022
Registration Date
06-06-2022
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.Rajethiran
Adv. Mr.C.Stanly Manoharan
Respondent(s)
Kamalaveni
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Primary District Civil Court in Vellore ruled in favor of the plaintiff (R. Ravi Chandra) in a property sale case (O.S.85/2022). The court ordered the defendant to execute and register a sale deed for a property within two months after receiving the remaining balance of ₹10,000, and directed the defendant to pay litigation costs. The court found that the plaintiff had fulfilled his obligations under the 2005 sale agreement and was ready and willing to complete the transaction, while the defendant had repeatedly delayed executing the deed despite receiving installments over several years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Primary District Civil Court in Vellore ruled in favor of the plaintiff (R. Ravi Chandra) in a property sale case (O.S.85/2022). The court ordered the defendant to execute and register a sale deed for a property within two months after receiving the remaining balance of ₹10,000, and directed the defendant to pay litigation costs. The court found that the plaintiff had fulfilled his obligations under the 2005 sale agreement and was ready and willing to complete the transaction, while the defendant had repeatedly delayed executing the deed despite receiving installments over several years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts